In order to develop an understanding of the potential efficacy of meditation as an stress management intervention (SMI) directed at stress and especially work stress, the evidence in the peer-reviewed literature was reviewed. Computer databases, including MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE, Current Contents and Biological Reports were consulted. I also searched the Internet, hardcopy reports and other sources of “grey literature”. Search terms included “stress”, “work”, “occupational”, “job”, “strain”, “meditation”, “stress management”, “psychotherapy”, “behaviour therapy”, “relaxation” and combinations of these terms. Of the 12 controlled studies found, 8 were described as RCTs and 4 as NRTs. The NRTs all compared meditation to either a waiting list or non-intervention control group, so it is not surprising that they all reported substantial positive effects of meditation. Such a design cannot however exclude the impact of non-specific effects such as placebo and spontaneous improvement and so were excluded from this review.
Of the 8 studies describing themselves as RCTs, those of Winzelberg and Peters clearly reported using a strategy that cannot be described as acceptable random allocation. Moreover, Peters used self-report questionnaires that had not been validated. They were re-classified as NRTs and excluded from this review.
The remaining 6 RCTs involved comparison with a number of different controls. Two used more than one control, simultaneously giving rise to 8 comparisons. The authors universally concluded that meditation was effective as an SMI.
Dr Ramesh Manocha